O Lost

I Don’t Feel Like I Have to Convince Myself Anymore November 11, 2008

Filed under: Religion — hopelessrecluse @ 10:07 pm
Tags: ,

There is strange liberty that comes from being absent from Evangelical Institution.  I spent most of my time there disgusted with the general population, some of the things they believed in and most of what they did.  I spent a lot of mental energy coming up with research that disputed what they said.  I think the most surprising thing that comes out of that research is that a lot of the more “avant garde” professors appreciated what I was doing, yet I don’t think they knew that the research I was doing was gradually leading me away from faith and religion.  I feel like I can be honest and say that lately, I’m just not really sure what I think about Christianity, other than that what I think is that it has too many problems for me to really buy into.

Retrospectively, I spent much of my young adult life trying to convince myself over and over again that Christianity is definitely true, and that as a system, it doesn’t have very many problems.  I also spent a lot of time trying to fit into the “Christian culture” and find a niche there.  Both of these reasons are probably why I went to Evangelical Institution.  But all of these things ended up creating an inauthentic self, one which was constantly divided between what I wanted to be and what I really was.  And it really had nothing to do with the idea of Christian redemption, because at the time, I really believed that redemption was possible, but I still felt like I wasn’t really this person who was standing there being this Christian.  I’m not sure that I’m ready to renounce religion altogether, but I can finally be honest with myself about religious matters without having to worry about feeling completely out of place.

There was a point in my life when I was ready to end being a Christian.  But then I had a moment of clarity, shall we say, when Christianity started making sense again.  It felt good at the time because I could finally feel normal again in an environment where normativity is almost as much of a value as Christ himself.  But I still spent a ton of my time doing research on things in that culture that I didn’t like and didn’t think made much sense.  Par example, when I was writing my paper in Women’s Literature about Biblical roles for women, and even the radical conclusion I came up with didn’t feel authentic.  I felt like I was copping out in some way.  I would probably throw out that paper now becuase it doesn’t say what I really think.  I thought that if I wanted to be a Christian, I had to think x, so I concluded the paper that way while still sliding in enough radical ideas to get by.  What a waste, considering that paper traded off with early drafts of my thesis.  It’s sort of sad to think about how much time I spent at that school trying to be something I was not.  I’m so glad I’m out now.  I’m looking forward to grad school so that I can be on some free ground that isn’t burdened by normativity and privileging of one way of thinking.

On the other hand, the idea of redemption is not all that bad, and I tend to like literature that has some redemptive ideas in it, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re Christian or support Christianity.  A lot of people think it does, but having redemption in a work doesn’t necessitate Christianity.  I find it interesting that a lot of the ideas that I was taught in class have led me to conclusions that wouldn’t be supported by the person who taught them to me.  I find this interesting indeed.

I’m not oppressed anymore, damnit, and it feels fucking awesome.  I’m done with trying to force myself to believe something.  If I can be intellectually honest with myself and believe it, then I will.  But I’m not going to try to force myself anymore.

No wonder I had so many mental problems in college.  Seriously.  No wonder I was so depressed all the time!  No wonder I had issues with studying.  IT’S NOT BECAUSE I’M INHERENTLY DUMB OR INCAPABLE OF DOING GOOD WORK, IT’S BECAUSE I WAS BEING INTELLECTUALLY OPPRESSED.  This takes off so much pressure on grad school.  Don’t ask me why, but it does.

P.S.  I can also realize (which I did several months ago) that The Jerk and I had issues not because of religion, but because he was a jerk and manipulated me, which is why my instincts were telling me to turn around.

 

Trying to Find Direction in the Post-”insert-word-here” World March 23, 2008

I have been going to an Episcopalian church every Sunday for the past few months.  This confession of sorts has elicited worried remarks from my mother, who is very wary of anything liturgical.  I’m not sure she knows why.  She grew up in a non-religious household and was saved after her mother died and became part of the Mennonite Church.  Later, after I was born, she and my father became part of a nondenominational church.  Therefore, I grew up in a church which lacked tradition.  The closest thing we had to tradition was having a missions festival every April.  I grew up in what could be described as the most disconnected church body that is possible.  Their doctrine was fine, and I probably still agree with most of it.  I’m actually still a member of this church; I became one when I was baptized when I was 16.  But doctrine is not the foremost problem of my current religious life.  Sure, doctrine forms the basis for the problems that I face, but it is not the foremost problem.  Protestant religions of all denominations share the same basic beliefs: the physical and historical death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the belief that the Bible is the word of God and is at least authoritative (if not inerrant), that God created the world by his own hand, that salvation is for those who believe in Christ, etc.  The difference is in the emphasis of these shared truths.  Also in the experience of salvation.  So, despite all of these shared beliefs, why is it that my mother becomes worried for me when I tell her that I am going to an Episcopalian Church?  Why is she afraid of liturgy?  Why do I think that Episcopalians think me odd when I tell them that I go to Evangelical Institution and not Secular Woman’s College?  Why are Evangelical Churches so ugly?

I think this has a lot to do with how they look at the self.

I don’t know much about the Evangelical tradition in an academic sense.  I don’t know much about its history or reasons for existence.  I do know my own experience within the Evangelical Church, both in my nondenominational church growing up and my experience at Evangelical Institution, the bastion of the Evangelical movement within the past 30 years.  While I do not think that personal experience or small and personal encounters with other Christians should determine my beliefs in God, I do think they determine my religious experience, and thus, the church tradition I choose to align myself with.  For example, I would not reject a belief in God based on a specific church (not Church, capital “C”) or a specific person or specific life experiences.  I believe deeply in certain transcendent truths which mean more to me than experiences.  But I would reject certain ways of believing based on experiences with a church and its members and leaders because the Church is part of the religious experience.  What I see on a day-to-day basis affects how I experience religion, and the way I choose to worship is part of my religion.  Thus, there are certain truths that unite the Church, but the experiences are widely different and the emphasis placed on each is different.  I don’t think that certain ways are more right or wrong than another (I don’t think that Catholics aren’t true Christians, as many Evangelicals seem to believe; I remember a missionary coming to my church to explain how to evangelize Catholics, which now strikes me as very odd and divisive) but I do think that emphasizing religion one way or another can be harmful to the religious experiences of many Christians, causing them to leave the church.  I don’t think that I can say with any authority here how things should be done, but I can say how they could be done.

My own experience with Evangelicalism has been both ardent and cynical.  Growing up, I was a “good little Christian” girl, and I was pretty conservative in my religious practice.  At least Evangelicalism, with its emphasis on a “personal relationship with Christ” and its insistence on the God-You bubble, can be beneficial for teenagers, who are trying to forge their own path through everything anyway.  But once you get past that teenage fervor, what is there to lean on?  If the self loses its faith and passion, what do you have to lean on?  Of course there is the rest of the Evangelical Church, but it seems that this church is just a bunch of selves getting together with each other, and so there’s still not much to go back on.  The other thing that Evangelicals seem to hold onto is the “reasonability” of their faith.  They all need a reasonable explanation for what they believe.  I think this has something to do with the reactionary nature of Evangelicalism.  The “Culture Wars” and whatnot.  This also has a lot to do with the extreme focus on the self and the independence that Evangelicalism has.  We have the Bible, but interpretations of that text can differ from generation to generation.  This focus on the self has a lot to do with the scorn of liturgy and tradition.  The reason why my mom is afraid of tradition and liturgy is because she thinks that it steals the self-determination from religion, as if reciting liturgy is something that will prevent me from thinking on my own and make my religion become  routine rather than meaningful.  I’ll answer this shortly.  The other problem I have with Evangelicalism is its insistence on pulpit politics.  I don’t think that my worship experience in the Church should be muddled and adulturated by discussions of politics.  Yes, my political decisions should be based on my religious beliefs, but my pastor shouldn’t be the one who is telling me who I should vote for.  Those three things are the main problems I have with Evangelicalism as it exists today: its reactionary nature, its extreme emphasis on the self (which causes the reaction), and its insistence on telling me who to vote for.  These things may work fine for other people (mainly the people of my parents’ generation), but they don’t work for me, and I suspect, many other people who are also struggling religiously.

The lack of tradition in the Evangelical Church is frightening to me.  Growing up in a nondenominational church, I knew absolutely nothing about Church tradition, which forms the basis for the beliefs of Christianity.  I had no clue why, during lent, there are crosses with purple cloths draped on them which turn white on Easter.  I had no clue what all those weird letters on banners in front of the Church are or what they mean.  I didn’t know any creeds.  I knew hymns, but they were largely replaced by sappy choruses by the time I was a teenager.  But my understanding of this lack of knowledge didn’t come about until I came to Evangelical Institution (EI), where I saw many of these things and started learning about them.  I was out of the nondenominational bubble which took pride in its independence from every single tradition that ever existed.  I’m not kidding about that.  Symbols and traditions that exist in other churches were not found in mine growing up.  You can’t learn about these things from the Bible.  So, I came to EI and was confronted with tons of experiences that I was not prepared for, because my church based everything on the self.  So when I started having problems, I reacted to those by distancing myself from the church and becoming cynical about it.  I had nothing to fall back on.  But now I realize how incredibly important these traditions are.  I don’t think that knowing what the color purple means will somehow prevent me from rejecting Christianity, but the way of religious experience which emphasizes traditions and symbols allows the individual Christian to cope when there are questions.  It also adds to the richness and meaning of the religious experience.  I remember that, after communion every first Sunday of the month, everyone in our church joined hands and sang the third stanza of “How Great Thou Art.”  The beautiful organ swell of the music and the human contact and sense of something bigger than myself always made me cry.  Every single time it happened.  It was the same every single time, but each time it made me cry.  Each time was meaningful to me.  When they stopped doing that, I felt a loss.  I’m sure that if that could happen again, I would still cry.  There was no other tradition in our church. 

When I go to the Episcopalian Church, I feel both bewilderment and a sense of belonging.  I feel bewilderment because there are so many things that happen which I don’t know the meaning of.  People wear robes and they say things every week that everyone except me seems to know.  Luckily, I know the Lord’s Prayer, but that’s about it (although I am learning).  People kneel on little benches that unfold from the bottom of the pew.  There are symbols all over the place that I don’t know about.  But in this way, I feel belonging because of these routines.  They are deeply meaningful, even because of their mystery to me.  I know that people have recited these prayers and sang these songs for hundreds, even thousands of years before me.  And in that recitation, their truth is confirmed.  And every week, the priest says the same things, which remind of what it means to be a Christian every week.  I don’t have to rely on myself for everything, because I have time-confirmed tradition to remind me that I am not the only one who is having these struggles and that I am not the only one who has been a Christian.